Service-Oriented Architecture vs Microservices Architecture

Introduction

Service-Oriented Architecture vs Microservices is now becoming the top priority for a significant group of developers as these architectures help them in developing applications that are independently deployable and consist of a set of dissociated services. With the increasing need for better performance and scalability of applications, the older architectures are becoming obsolete at a fast rate. They have both similarities and differences; here, we are going to understand their concepts and their differences.

Service-Oriented Architecture

It is a software designing style or architecture in which communication protocols are used by the application components to provide services to other components. It is a collection of services communicating with each other. In Service-Oriented Architecture, individual services are organized around a particular business process and adhere to a communication protocol (like SOAP, ActiveMQ, or Apache Thrift) to share themselves through the ESB

Microservices

Popularly known as Microservice Architecture, these are software development techniques. It came into existence as an alternative to traditional development techniques. It structures the software/application into a collection of finely-grained services. These services are loosely coupled and self-contained.

The unit/part of software which performs some specific work or task is known as Service, Some of the services in Service-oriented architecture and Microservices architecture are:

Services in Service-Oriented Architecture

The services in Service Oriented Architecture can be divided into four categories

  • Infrastructure Services: These are the services that implement some non-functional tasks like logging, authentication, and security. These can further be divided into the following categories:
    • Communication services: These services are concerned with message transportation.
    • Utility services: This provide other technical capabilities like reusable functions, event logging, notification etc. but not the transfer/transportation of messages.
  • Business Services: These are services required to perform some business functions. These can also be named as Application services. It has these categories under it:
    • Activity Services: Provide specific business capabilities.
    • Process Services: They contain business logic.
    • Entity Services: Work to show/expose information stored in backend databases.
    • Capability Services: Provide general business capabilities.
  • Application Services: These are the services that provide a dedicated user interface to invoke other services. They are limited to the context of some specific applications.
  • Enterprise Services: They do the work of implementing the functionality, which is defined by the business services. They need the help of infrastructure services and application services to complete the business requests.

Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture

  • Improved flexibility and information flow.
  • Significant amounts decrease the development cost and management costs.
  • Data confidentiality is improved.
  • New function combination developing ability and speed is increased.
  • Better reliability.
  • The system upgrades are readily available and introduced quickly.
  • Manageability and security are improved.
  • The defects are decreased, and the testing is improved.

Services in Microservices

Microservices are divided into two major categories of services, which are :

  • Infrastructure Services: These services perform tasks like security, logging, and auditing.
  • Functional Services: These services help in performing business functions for specific operations and services. The services are accessed externally and are not shared with any other services.

Benefits of Microservices

  • Speed and productivity are increased as it decomposes the applications/software into faster developing and manageable services.
  • The microservice architecture is flexible with technologies, and different services that are written in different languages can run together.
  • The microservice is easily deployable.
  • It is easier to change, enhance, and test.
  • The services are independent and have no or meager impact on other co-existing services.

Service-Oriented Architecture vs Microservices Architecture

Service-Oriented Architecture and Microservices/Microservice architecture have a lot of standard utilities, but they also have a lot of differences, which are described as follows:

  • Size Difference: The size difference is based on the granularity of the components inside the architectures. The components or services in Microservice architecture are comparably much smaller and lighter than that of Service-oriented architecture. The Service-Oriented Architecture components/services are not that detailed and are less finely grained, that is why it has less number of components available, but are comparably bigger.
  • Scope Difference: The Service-Oriented Architecture includes loads of business features and functionality and is used as a complete subsystem most of the time, while microservices perform the single task that they are designed to perform.
  • Data Storage Difference: The services in Service Oriented Architecture share common data storage most of the time. In the case of Microservices, there can be an independent data storage section for each service. The services can access their independent storage service when they need to.
  • Development Dependency: Both Service Oriented Architecture and Microservices are built to be managed by several teams, but in the case of Service Oriented Architecture, the communication mechanism needs to be common for all teams. While in Microservices, each team can work on distinct service that can be developed and deployed without the interference of other services
  • Remote Accessing Protocols: The Service-Oriented Architectures use Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) or messaging mostly for remote access, while Microservice architecture relies mostly on REST and sometimes does the work through simple messaging such as MSMQ.
  • The sharing of components: Here is where the concept of ‘bounded context’ comes into the light, which is used by Microservices to decrease or minimize the sharing of components. In the case of Service Oriented Architecture, the sharing of components is enhanced and is a common approach. Because of multiple services sharing the components, the systems are comparatively slower in the case of Service-Oriented Architectures.
  • API layer vs. Messaging middleware: Service Oriented Architecture has a component named messaging middleware, while Microservice architecture uses the API layer. The messaging middleware has some benefits over the API layer, such as enhancement of message, protocol transformation, and routing. The API layer is present between service consumers and service in the case of Microservice architecture.

Conclusion

Even based on these differences in Service-Oriented Architecture vs Microservices, there is no method in which one is better because both of them have their benefits and issues. Service-Oriented Architecture can be a better option to build complicated and broad application environments related to business, and Microservices can be suitable for small systems or web-based systems. Thus the debate of Service-Oriented Architecture vs Microservices can conclude with the purpose of the application decides the architecture. 


Leave a Comment

Name required.
Enter a Valid Email Address.
Comment required.(Min 30 Char)