In this page, we will show you the real difference between Traditional vs Cloud Native Applications to scale up your business. So, let’s get started with a quick introduction to both of the terms. Traditional Applications are the ones which were created 10 to 20 years ago. These basic applications run on a mainframe environment or do have a client/server environment. Most of the people in information technology(IT) usually refer to these applications only as “really old”, ”ancient”. They are old workhorses that have not been retired yet. To expand the Application based on these technologies usually brings a lot of hassle. Plenty of new Additional hardware has to be purchased to upgrade or scale up to the next level in terms of data storage and support services. Cloud Computing is a term which has become quite popular in recent time, regardless of the fact if you are working in IT or not. We are moving away from the world of inactive, flat, and sluggish worlds of traditional Applications to the world, which is faster, active, and versatile in its approach. The concept of Cloud-Native Applications started making its impression in the last ten years or so, but it brought the necessary change in the process and the ideas and this is why Traditional vs Cloud Native Applications comparison came into existence.
Why is Everyone Inclining Towards Cloud-Native Applications?
The organizations are shifting from Traditional application methodologies to the cloud-native mindset. Cloud-native is the name for an approach for building applications and the services which are specific to the cloud environment. It represents the characteristics of the apps and services. Cloud approach helps Businesses to reach their full potential. The Cloud-native trend is growing so fast that it is reshaping the core idea of how the companies tackle application development projects. Research indicates that organizations are adopting the cloud-native application development techniques, and by the year 2020, almost 32% of new enterprise applications will be developed as the cloud-native projects.
Traditional vs Cloud Native Applications: A Quick Roundup
In the subsequent section, we will show you the best and the worst of these two application development techniques. So, get ready:
1. Development Time
Traditional Applications usually take a lot of time to be built, especially when compared to the Cloud-native counterpart. They are usually developed and released as one big package. Whereas, Cloud-native experts, conform to a framework that is designed to maximize flexibility.
2. Operating System Dependency
The other main comparison is in terms of OS. The traditional Application architecture allows for the dependency between the operating system and the application. This dependency is the reason which makes migration and the scalability an entire complex and challenging issue. Whereas, the architecture for the Application based on cloud-native is designed to permit developers to use the platforms as a means to abstract away the dependencies. The main motive behind this is to let the teams focus on what matters while comparing Traditional vs Cloud Native Applications.
3. Release Pace
The Cloud-native approach also ensures a faster release pace for an update means a company is responding to the user need faster, which eventually will increase the retention of users. This is only possible because a specific bug can be located or traced to a particular microservice within a specific container, once that bug is fixed hence will be updated quickly. After all, it is not an entirely new version of the application. It is just some new lines of code. The amount of time spent searching the problem’s source and then working on a fix is significantly less compared to the traditional approach, which eventually saves a lot of time and money.
The other main difference is the way development works in both cases, In traditional applications, the developers will provide the finished application code to the operations team, and they will run that in production, which slows things down. The Priorities of the organizational structure in traditional applications take priority over customer value Whereas the cloud-native follows a different approach as it is the combination of people, processes, and tools. It provides a swift and smooth transition towards the transfer of finished application code into the production.
Cloud-native is cost-effective, and you only pay for what you use, not like traditional Applications where you have to set up the data storage and all the services. This is despite the amount of work being done as the downtime is low, which means that the work performance is improved. The profit is increased in the longer run.
The security of data is a significant concern, and cloud might seem less secure than storing data at local storage as anyone with access to the server can view and use the data stored, and the application on the cloud. But it is one of the primary reasons why Cloud-Native Security is famous as the ability of the data to be accessed from anywhere across the globe makes it easy to use.
Risks of Traditional App Development
Traditional App Development is a good way to develop applications, however, it comprises some serious risks that might impact your business severely. For example:
When an organization works on the automation process, there is always a risk of hard-coding some human errors into its essential infrastructure. Also, the incorporation of human operators slows down the process of diagnosing issues. The use of computer automation nullifies these challenges.
This might occur with human error and the downtime. Automation means the same set of rules will be applied consistently regardless of the size of the Deployed application. In the cloud, there is a fair amount of automation. Updates are deployed automatically without interfering with the deployed application or the user base. Scalability, testing, as well as the resource allocation, can be automated. Cloud provides Greater Protection from failures. As all the microservices are isolated in containers means if something fails, it is only limited in its scope; the whole application does not go down, which makes it more reliable. In case of widespread failure, the automation restores the deployed application to the previous stable working state, in cases like these, the downtime for such application is minimal or nonexistent. Automated testing is a protector as if the application is deviating from specific parameters, it is detected, and a team starts working on it.
3. Low Backup Capabilities
Traditional applications often offer low backup capabilities, and a small mistake can lead to failure. Whereas, backups on the cloud are automated. The containers provide dynamic and high-quality virtualization on top of the VM matching microservices. Clusters are placed across the VM to get its benefits in elastic scaling and recovery. The traditional application can always be refactored by changing the code and not changing the infrastructure of the site and moving to the cloud infrastructure.
Traditional vs Cloud Native Applications: What’s Best?
The bottom line is that traditional applications have helped us to change the way we have been conducting business over the years. Still, Cloud-Native architecture focuses on improving the infrastructure and exploits the full potential out of business. This is why it is recommended to opt for Cloud Native Applications for better business performance.